<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cher&#039;s canvas &#187; write-paper</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/research/tag/write-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/research</link>
	<description>Exploring the messy confluence of technology and people (law)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How (and How Not) to Write a Good Design Paper</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/research/2013/11/08/how-and-how-not-to-write-a-good-design-paper/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/research/2013/11/08/how-and-how-not-to-write-a-good-design-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[write-paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jollyvip.com/research/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the days before the internet/www (yup! in the early 80s) became hip or cool (and now an indispensable tool), my colleagues and friends will have face-2-face debates/chats/arguments on why such a language/tool is better than this and that. It was usually about one&#8217;s favorite programming language but it was fun time. This may <a href='https://jollyvip.com/research/2013/11/08/how-and-how-not-to-write-a-good-design-paper/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the days before the internet/www (yup! in the early 80s) became hip or cool (and now an indispensable tool), my colleagues and friends will have face-2-face debates/chats/arguments on why such a language/tool is better than this and that. It was usually about one&#8217;s favorite programming language but it was fun time. This may sound pretty mundane and boring nowadays in this world of tweeting and blogging. </p>
<p><Sigh> Nostalgia is healthy but time rolls on&#8230;</p>
<p>Somehow my rolling back the years serve to remind me that writing a paper is like having a healthy (i.e. productive/useful/meaningful/novel etc and FUN!) verbal exchanges of ideas/thoughts/views except in written form. </p>
<p>So what else is there to consider when it comes to writing a paper especially a research paper for specific audience? </p>
<p>I am sure there are many ways to skin a cat &#8211; not nice to a cat &#8211; as some would let you believe!<br />
So how not to skin a cat but still able to write my ideas (or stuff!) that I see fit or worthy of others attention. This is assuming one write a research paper because you want others to read about your ideas or stuff. </p>
<p>This paper &#8211; <a href="http://www.ida.liu.se/~matar/designpaper.pdf" title="How (and How Not) to Write  a Good Design Paper" target="_blank">How (and How Not) to Write a Good Design Paper</a> &#8211; makes sense to me so must be &#8216;good&#8217; paper to me. Now, do I consider form and/or structure first or just follow my own inner voices? </p>
<p>A <a href="http://jollyvip.com/research/how-to-write-a-good-design-paper/" title="freemind map how to write a good design paper" target="_blank">freemind map</a> listing the key points extracted from the paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/research/2013/11/08/how-and-how-not-to-write-a-good-design-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
