<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; Todd v Guidance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/todd-v-guidance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Todd v Guidance Software &#8211; Arbitrator ordered backup data to be produced</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/02/18/todd-v-guidance-software-arbitrator-ordered-backup-data-to-be-produced/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/02/18/todd-v-guidance-software-arbitrator-ordered-backup-data-to-be-produced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitral Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitrators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup tapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd v Guidance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/2009/02/18/todd-v-guidance-software-arbitrator-ordered-backup-data-to-be-produced/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In arbitration, inaccessible data is data to be discovered and produced as shown in the Cassondra Todd v Guidance Software case. There&#8217;re several reports on this case which you can search via google. This report (also tweeted) gives a best guess of the timeline of the events, which I find handy to scan, read and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In arbitration, inaccessible data is data to be discovered and produced as shown in the Cassondra Todd v Guidance Software case. There&#8217;re several reports on this case which you can search via google. This <a href="http://www.planeteim.com/misc/guid_200902.html#guidanceresponse">report</a> (also tweeted) gives a best guess of the timeline of the events, which I find handy to scan, read and make my own analysis.</p>
<p>What are your views on the arbitrator&#8217;s order for disclosure of data residing on backup tapes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/02/18/todd-v-guidance-software-arbitrator-ordered-backup-data-to-be-produced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
