<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; P.R.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/prc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An example of a Piecemeal Approach &#8211; Personal Information Protection</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P.R.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remembered doing a bit of research into the Constitution of the P.R.C. (for my Data Protection LLM module) back in 2003. I wondered what my synthesis would be now. Has the P.R.C. legal landscape changed over the past six years? A Chinese lawyer friend visited me (as I will be leaving town soon – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered doing a bit of research into the Constitution of the P.R.C. (for my Data Protection LLM module) back in 2003. I wondered what my synthesis would be now. Has the P.R.C. legal landscape changed over the past six years?</p>
<p>A Chinese lawyer friend visited me (as I will be leaving town soon – an informal good-bye stuff) this week. Somehow we ended up discussing ‘justice’ in China over several cups of tea and goodies from Hong Kong.</p>
<p>One day I will write more…</p>
<p>Today, I received this article &#8211; <a href="http://linkbee.com/CLMPL">Personal Information Protection in China &#8211; © 2009 Hunton &amp; Williams LLP, New York, New York</a> in my mail. Mmm… the local law in China (for me) is probably a bit like the stuff over tea and cookies which ‘justice’ can’t bite or should I say ‘chew and swallow’. In a way the piecemeal, act-by-act basis of introducing law or any act sounds like chewing and swallowing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
