<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; Gartner</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/gartner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gartner’s 2nd Annual Magic Quadrant for E-Discovery</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2012/05/27/gartners-2nd-annual-magic-quadrant-for-e-discovery/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2012/05/27/gartners-2nd-annual-magic-quadrant-for-e-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic Quadrant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Magic Quadrant for E-Discovery is available for purchase at Gartner&#8217;s site. I wonder whether the survey/research also considered Open Source ediscovery platforms. I suspect not from the free review at Law.com. I also wonder whether the Magic Quadrant took into consideration the usage or the applicability of the products for edisclosure as in international [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Magic Quadrant for E-Discovery is available for purchase at <a title="gartner's magic quadrant 2012" href="http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1AP7UDR&amp;ct=120530&amp;st=sg" target="_blank">Gartner&#8217;s site.</a></p>
<p>I wonder whether the survey/research also considered Open Source ediscovery platforms. I suspect not from the free review at <a href="http://bit.ly/LRT5od"> Law.com.</a></p>
<p>I also wonder whether the Magic Quadrant took into consideration the usage or the applicability of the products for edisclosure as in international arbitration and/or cross-border disputes. I suspect not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2012/05/27/gartners-2nd-annual-magic-quadrant-for-e-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
