<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; forensic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/forensic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>forensic classification of specialities &#8211; one approach</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/03/forensic-classification-of-specialities-one-approach/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/03/forensic-classification-of-specialities-one-approach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crfp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speciality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last December, I attended a digital forensic course given by the London School of Informatics, City University. On my ToDo list (many ToDo!) after the course was to find out how the courts and the forensic practitioners classify the various technical or speciality areas (if any). Here&#8217;s one approach adopted by the Council for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last December, I attended a <a href="http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/digitalforensics">digital forensic </a> course given by the London School of Informatics, City University. On my ToDo list (many ToDo!) after the course was to find out how the courts and the forensic practitioners classify the various technical or speciality areas (if any).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one <a href="http://www.crfp.org.uk/specialties/distinguishing/distinguishing.htm"> approach </a>adopted by the Council for the Registration of Forensic Practitioners (crfp).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/03/forensic-classification-of-specialities-one-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
