<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; electronic documents</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/electronic-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Production of electronic documents</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/10/01/production-of-electronic-documents/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/10/01/production-of-electronic-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitral Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European (non UK)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Task Force]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement at the ICC website on &#8216;Task Force on Production of Electronic Documents in Arbitration&#8217; appears to me to be the start of more Task Forces to come. I do not know why the ICC specifically use the term ‘Production’. Why not just a Task Force for electronic disclosure or electronic documents? I fear [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The announcement at the ICC website on <a href="http://www.iccwbo.org/policy/arbitration/index.html?id=23620">&#8216;Task Force on Production of Electronic Documents in Arbitration&#8217;</a> appears to me to be the start of more Task Forces to come.</p>
<p>I do not know why the ICC specifically use the term ‘Production’. Why not just a Task Force for electronic disclosure or electronic documents?</p>
<p>I fear that by having a Task Force for ‘Production of electronic documents’ and with a mandate specifying two streams (i.e. disclosure and production) signal the potential to focus on disclosure and production with the outcome to report on ‘production of electronic documents’.</p>
<p>The ICC has great world class reports and publications and also a great institution in many ways.</p>
<p>I do hope this new Task Force will break convention and not just focus on the production aspects of e-disclosure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/10/01/production-of-electronic-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
