<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; disclosure</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/disclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>where disclosure of document is not a breach of confidentiality</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/28/where-disclosure-of-document-is-not-a-breach-of-confidentiality/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/28/where-disclosure-of-document-is-not-a-breach-of-confidentiality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitral Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My lawyer friend, John (thanks!) e-mailed me a piece of news posted at thelawyer.com site Not related to electronic disclosure (from the news report) but still worth noting. Confidentiality in arbitration not to be taken for granted. According to the Court of Appeal, &#8216;any future disputes on the disclosure of documents should be resolved by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My lawyer friend, John (thanks!) e-mailed me a piece of news posted at <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=131849">thelawyer.com site </a></p>
<p>Not related to electronic disclosure (from the news report) but still worth noting.</p>
<p>Confidentiality in arbitration not to be taken for granted. According to the Court of Appeal, &#8216;any future disputes on the disclosure of documents should be resolved by agreement&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/28/where-disclosure-of-document-is-not-a-breach-of-confidentiality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence Disclosure in Chinese International Arbitration</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/01/10/evidence-disclosure-in-chinese-international-arbitration/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/01/10/evidence-disclosure-in-chinese-international-arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A DataRuleLaw Log]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitral Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What can we glimpse (&#38; learn?) from the Chinese where Alternative Dispute Resolution has been the way of resolving disputes from the Confucian era to current digital era? For a glimpse on Chinese international arbitration, check out the pdf article: Tipping the Scale to Bring a Balanced Approach: Evidence Disclosure in Chinese International Arbitration. By [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana">What can we glimpse (&amp; learn?) from the Chinese where Alternative Dispute Resolution has been the way of resolving disputes from the Confucian era to current digital era?<br />
For a glimpse on Chinese international arbitration, check out the </span><a href="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=bryant_yang" title="evidence disclosure china">pdf article</a><span style="font-family: Verdana">: Tipping the Scale to Bring a Balanced Approach: Evidence Disclosure in Chinese International Arbitration. By Bryant Yuan Fu Yang and Diane Chen Dai</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana">Now this is what I consider really interesting…the article is also ‘<strong><em>meant as a guide for foreign investors and companies who seek to have an uncooperative opposing party or nonparty disclose evidence.’</em></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/01/10/evidence-disclosure-in-chinese-international-arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
