<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; confidentiality</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/confidentiality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>where disclosure of document is not a breach of confidentiality</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/28/where-disclosure-of-document-is-not-a-breach-of-confidentiality/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/28/where-disclosure-of-document-is-not-a-breach-of-confidentiality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitral Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My lawyer friend, John (thanks!) e-mailed me a piece of news posted at thelawyer.com site Not related to electronic disclosure (from the news report) but still worth noting. Confidentiality in arbitration not to be taken for granted. According to the Court of Appeal, &#8216;any future disputes on the disclosure of documents should be resolved by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My lawyer friend, John (thanks!) e-mailed me a piece of news posted at <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=131849">thelawyer.com site </a></p>
<p>Not related to electronic disclosure (from the news report) but still worth noting.</p>
<p>Confidentiality in arbitration not to be taken for granted. According to the Court of Appeal, &#8216;any future disputes on the disclosure of documents should be resolved by agreement&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/03/28/where-disclosure-of-document-is-not-a-breach-of-confidentiality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
