<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; china</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two different approaches to privacy</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/10/14/two-different-approaches-to-privacy/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/10/14/two-different-approaches-to-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/2009/10/14/two-different-approaches-to-privacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I can&#8217;t tweet I will use my blog to post. Research into trust model(s) in the cloud and a new credit privacy rule (still in draft according to the report) in China.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I can&#8217;t tweet I will use my blog to post.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091013162746.htm">Research i</a>nto trust model(s) in the cloud and a new <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-10/14/content_8790079.htm">credit privacy rule</a> (still in draft according to the report) in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/10/14/two-different-approaches-to-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence Disclosure in Chinese International Arbitration</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/01/10/evidence-disclosure-in-chinese-international-arbitration/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/01/10/evidence-disclosure-in-chinese-international-arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A DataRuleLaw Log]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitral Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What can we glimpse (&#38; learn?) from the Chinese where Alternative Dispute Resolution has been the way of resolving disputes from the Confucian era to current digital era? For a glimpse on Chinese international arbitration, check out the pdf article: Tipping the Scale to Bring a Balanced Approach: Evidence Disclosure in Chinese International Arbitration. By [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana">What can we glimpse (&amp; learn?) from the Chinese where Alternative Dispute Resolution has been the way of resolving disputes from the Confucian era to current digital era?<br />
For a glimpse on Chinese international arbitration, check out the </span><a href="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=bryant_yang" title="evidence disclosure china">pdf article</a><span style="font-family: Verdana">: Tipping the Scale to Bring a Balanced Approach: Evidence Disclosure in Chinese International Arbitration. By Bryant Yuan Fu Yang and Diane Chen Dai</span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana">Now this is what I consider really interesting…the article is also ‘<strong><em>meant as a guide for foreign investors and companies who seek to have an uncooperative opposing party or nonparty disclose evidence.’</em></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2008/01/10/evidence-disclosure-in-chinese-international-arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
