<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/tag/2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Farewell to the noughties</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/12/27/farewell-to-the-noughties/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/12/27/farewell-to-the-noughties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foursquare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tui3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/2009/12/27/farewell-to-the-noughties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is change constant? Perhaps only when it comes to changing to a new year, a new calendar. Should I look back to the noughties years (2000s) or even well before the noughties years? I guess it won’t make any sense to compare or contrast past year’s events or developments especially when it comes to talking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is change constant? Perhaps only when it comes to changing to a new year, a new calendar. Should I look back to the noughties years (2000s) or even well before the noughties years?</p>
<p>I guess it won’t make any sense to compare or contrast past year’s events or developments especially when it comes to talking about technology or the internet. Still…it does make interesting reading if one can grasp the full extent of the changing technological landscape.</p>
<p>Since I am only able to recognize the changing calendar and as I have been on the move a lot over the past years, my newsfeed are via my friends or from social media sites. Being in Beijing means access to social media sites and blog sites takes on a new dimension. I have to re-invent how I connect with new friends and turn to the <a href="http://foursquare.com/mobile/">foursquare</a> to ‘shout’ out my location or bearing. Would anyone find my identity and location in 2012? (see the movie?!)</p>
<p>Nothing to do with ediscovery but a reminder that I am in Beijing and a Chinese friend has a new business at <a href="http://www.tui3.com/">www.tui3.com</a>   My challenge is to learn mandarin (fast enough!?) such that I can use this site.</p>
<p>Before I say farewell to the noughties, here is a glimpse of what someone said ‘<a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Data-Storage/What-You-Need-to-Know-About-EDiscovery-in-2010-514136/?kc=rss">you need to know about e-discovery in 2010’.</a></p>
<p>Notice any changes? I can only recognize the change from 2009 to 2010.</p>
<p>Happy 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/12/27/farewell-to-the-noughties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An example of a Piecemeal Approach &#8211; Personal Information Protection</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P.R.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remembered doing a bit of research into the Constitution of the P.R.C. (for my Data Protection LLM module) back in 2003. I wondered what my synthesis would be now. Has the P.R.C. legal landscape changed over the past six years? A Chinese lawyer friend visited me (as I will be leaving town soon – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered doing a bit of research into the Constitution of the P.R.C. (for my Data Protection LLM module) back in 2003. I wondered what my synthesis would be now. Has the P.R.C. legal landscape changed over the past six years?</p>
<p>A Chinese lawyer friend visited me (as I will be leaving town soon – an informal good-bye stuff) this week. Somehow we ended up discussing ‘justice’ in China over several cups of tea and goodies from Hong Kong.</p>
<p>One day I will write more…</p>
<p>Today, I received this article &#8211; <a href="http://linkbee.com/CLMPL">Personal Information Protection in China &#8211; © 2009 Hunton &amp; Williams LLP, New York, New York</a> in my mail. Mmm… the local law in China (for me) is probably a bit like the stuff over tea and cookies which ‘justice’ can’t bite or should I say ‘chew and swallow’. In a way the piecemeal, act-by-act basis of introducing law or any act sounds like chewing and swallowing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/08/14/an-example-of-a-piecemeal-approach-personal-information-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
