<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edisclosure myth or reality? &#187; Case Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/category/case-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure</link>
	<description>From litigation to the arbitration regime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic Discovery/Disclosure: From Litigation to International Commercial Arbitration</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2018/09/15/electronic-discoverydisclosure-from-litigation-to-international-commercial-arbitration/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2018/09/15/electronic-discoverydisclosure-from-litigation-to-international-commercial-arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 19:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cited-referenced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to know that my paper dated 2008 has been cited in: Revised UNCITRAL Arbitration rules Seen through the Prism of Electronic Disclosure, The [article] Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 28, Issue 1 (February 2011), pp. 51-66 Kozlowska, Daria 28 J. Int&#8217;l Arb. 51 (2011) My contribution: An early conference in the form of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know that my paper dated <strong>2008</strong> has been cited in:</p>
<p><strong>Revised UNCITRAL Arbitration rules Seen through the Prism of Electronic Disclosure, The [article]<br />
Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 28, Issue 1 (February 2011), pp. 51-66<br />
Kozlowska, Daria<br />
28 J. Int&#8217;l Arb. 51 (2011)</strong></p>
<p>My contribution:<br />
<strong>An early conference in the form of a case management meeting has been pointed out by numerous commentators as being a tool for a more efficient management of arbitral proceedings in cases involving electronic evidence.</strong><em></p>
<p>Many thanks to Daria Kozlowska.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2018/09/15/electronic-discoverydisclosure-from-litigation-to-international-commercial-arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>over 900 US cases</title>
		<link>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/02/26/over-900-us-cases/</link>
		<comments>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/02/26/over-900-us-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ediscovery database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K&L Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iedisc.com/2009/02/26/over-900-us-cases/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this electronic discovery database and wondered if there is a similar database for non US cases. I will continue to search for non US cases. For information, the electronic discovery database is maintained by K&#38;L Gates and here&#8217;s the blurb: &#8220;Electronic Discovery Case Database  K&#38;L Gates maintains and continually updates a database [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this <a href="https://extranet1.klgates.com/ediscovery/">electronic discovery database </a>and wondered if there is a similar database for non US cases. I will continue to search for non US cases.</p>
<p>For information, the electronic discovery database is maintained by K&amp;L Gates and here&#8217;s the blurb:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Electronic Discovery Case Database  												 											 											 												 													K&amp;L Gates maintains and continually updates a database containing over 900  													electronic discovery cases collected from state and federal jurisdictions around  													the United States.  This database is searchable by keyword, as well as by any  													combination of 28 different case attributes, e.g., on-site inspection, allegations  													of spoliation, motion for a preservation order, etc.  Each search will produce a  													list of relevant cases, including a brief description of the nature and disposition of  													each case, the electronic evidence involved and a link to a more detailed case summary if available.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jollyvip.com/edisclosure/2009/02/26/over-900-us-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
